- 1. The Scope of the Book: Estate Planning Introduced
- 1.4.5 Three recent taxpayer successes
- 1.5.7 Transactions in securities
- 1.5.13 Two offshore disclosure regimes: 2007 and 2009
- 1.6.1 ‘Spotlights’ and ‘Signposts’
- 4. Trusts: Tax-Efficient Management
- 6. The Family Business
- 9. Investments
- 11. Pensions
- 11.2.2 Withdrawing benefits
- 11.2.3 Transitional provisions
- 11.2.4 Unregistered schemes
- 11.3.1 The basic rule
- 11.3.2 Tax relief
- 11.3.3 Scheme input periods
- 11.3.4 Occupational schemes
- 11.4.1 SIPPs and SSASs distinguished
- 11.4.3 Transactions with employers
- 11.5.2 Tax-free cash
- 11.5.5 Death benefits
- 11.5.6 Age 75: ASP or annuity purchase?
- 11.5.7 Maximise or minimise income in retirement?
- 12. Charitable Giving
- 15. Leaving the UK
- 16. Non-UK Domiciliaries Living in the UK
- 17. Offshore Trusts and Companies
- 18. Wills
- 20. Compliance
Chapter: 2 - Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
Non-UK domiciled settlors and excluded property settlements
2.12.3
With settled property, the trust assets will be excluded property if situated outside the UK and if the settlor was domiciled outside the UK when the settlement was made (IHTA 1984 s48(3)). This applies regardless of a subsequent change of domicile by the settlor or indeed changes in the trust property, provided that the property remains outside the UK. HMRC Inheritance Tax have traditionally accepted, and have recently confirmed, that the GWR rules are ‘out-flanked’ by the excluded property rules. It matters not where the trustees are resident.
This is the rule even if the settlor has an initial 'estate' interest in possession and dies UK domiciled with that interest and if his children also UK domiciled have successive life interests. That said, there are two traps. First, where (in any case) property ceases to be subject to a reservation, the donor is treated as making a PET (FA 1986 s102(4)). That is, if the trustees exclude the settlor from benefit and he dies within seven years, he will be treated as having made a chargeable transfer, even if the property in the settlement is excluded property. The second trap applies in a case where the settlement gives initial estate interests in possession to the settlor and/or spouse/civil partner and, at the time when the interest of the last of them to have such an interest ends (typically on the second death), that beneficiary is actually or deemed UK domiciled, but the settlement continues, generally on or after 6 October 2008. Regardless of whether there is a continuing ‘estate’ interest in possession (as a transitional serial interest: see 4.6.7) or the relevant property regime applies, the UK domicile of the deemed settlor will mean that the erstwhile protection of excluded property settlement status is no longer available, even if the trust fund is situated outside the UK (under IHTA 1984 s80). See 16.6.3.


