- 1. The Scope of the Book: Estate Planning Introduced
- 1.4.4 The purposive approach
- 1.4.5 Three recent taxpayer successes
- 1.5.7 Transactions in securities
- 1.5.12 The three disclosure regimes
- 1.5.13 Two offshore disclosure regimes: 2007 and 2009
- 1.6.1 ‘Spotlights’ and ‘Signposts’
- 2. Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
- 3. Making Gifts: Outright or Protected?
- 4. Trusts: Tax-Efficient Management
- 6. The Family Business
- 6.1.3 Capital Gains Tax angles
- 6.3.5 Entrepreneurs’ Relief: Furnished Holiday Lettings
- 6.4.1 Summary principles
- 8. Chattels
- 9. Investments
- 11. Pensions
- 11.2.2 Withdrawing benefits
- 11.2.3 Transitional provisions
- 11.2.4 Unregistered schemes
- 11.3.1 The basic rule
- 11.3.2 Tax relief
- 11.3.3 Scheme input periods
- 11.3.4 Occupational schemes
- 11.4.1 SIPPs and SSASs distinguished
- 11.4.3 Transactions with employers
- 11.5.2 Tax-free cash
- 11.5.5 Death benefits
- 11.5.6 Age 75: ASP or annuity purchase?
- 11.5.7 Maximise or minimise income in retirement?
- 12. Charitable Giving
- 15. Leaving the UK
- 15.2.1 Overview
- 15.2.4 Occasional residence abroad not enough
- 15.2.5 Full-time work abroad
- 15.2.6 Ordinary residence
- 16. Non-UK Domiciliaries Living in the UK
- 17. Offshore Trusts and Companies
- 18. Wills
- 20. Compliance
Chapter: 2 - Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
The problem
2.4.1
The relentless rise in house prices over the last 20 years or so, albeit more recently suffering something of a reversal, is a problem not just for the first time buyer but also for the next generation on the deaths of the older property-owning generation. This is of course especially the case if one (or more) of the children wants to carry on living in the home which may have been in the family for some generations. So, what does one do, other than simply moving out and making a gift which one survives by seven years?
It was in response to several well-publicised successful attempts to avoid the GWR regime (by making an effective gift for IHT purposes while remaining in occupation) that the POA rules were introduced from 2005/06: see 3.2.2 and 3.2.3. While there are various planning possibilities open, the overriding concern must be the taxpayer’s own security of tenure if contemplating any form of lifetime gift. There is an obvious commercial risk in making a gift of the house to the children, even if the donor manages to avoid both the GWR and POA regimes. If the children then become insolvent or embroiled in matrimonial difficulties the house may have to be sold. Also, there is probably not much point in entering into an arrangement which might escape the rules on a technicality but which is more than likely to be attacked by HMRC later on.


