- 1. The Scope of the Book: Estate Planning Introduced
- 1.2.3 Other Taxes
- 1.5.14 Tackling tax avoidance: the 22 June 2010 Emergency Budget Proposals
- 1.6.1 ‘Spotlights’ and ‘Signposts’
- 2. Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
- 3. Making Gifts: Outright or Protected?
- 3.2.3 The pre-owned assets regime
- 3.2.4 Settlor-interested trusts: Income Tax and CGT
- 3.6.3 Formation
- 4. Trusts: Tax-Efficient Management
- 4.4.3 Capital Gains Tax
- 4.7.6 Related settlements
- 4.9.3 Power to accumulate or a discretion over income
- 5. The Family Home(s)
- 6. The Family Business
- 6.1.3 Capital Gains Tax angles
- 6.1.4 Other taxes
- 6.2.7 The period of ownership
- 6.3.1 The announcement of 24 January 2007 - and increasing thresholds
- 6.3.2 The detail of the legislation
- 6.6.2 Partnerships
- 9. Investments
- 10. Life Assurance
- 11. Pensions
- 11.1.2 Pensions not to be used for IHT mitigation
- 11.5.1 Overview
- 11.5.5 Death benefits
- 11.5.6 Age 75: ASP or annuity purchase?
- 12. Charitable Giving
- 12.2 Charities: The ‘fit and proper persons’ test in FA 2010
- 12.2.3 Tax advantages for donors summarised
- 12.2.3.1 Gift aid carry back: time limit for claim
- 13. The Family Unit
- 15. Leaving the UK
- 15.3.7 Gifts from UK to non-UK domiciliaries and reservation of benefit
- 15.3.8 Domicile: prospective government review
- 15.5.7 Differing status for different members of the family
- 16. Non-UK Domiciliaries Living in the UK
- 16.1.5 Further review of non-doms promised on 22 June 2010
- 16.3.2 Compliance
- 16.4.4 IHT and double taxation: the pre-capital transfer tax treaties and Switzerland
- 16.6.1 The statutory rule
- 16.6.2.1 Excluded property settlements and the UK private residence
- 17. Offshore Trusts and Companies
- 17.5.2 The capital payments charge in more detail
- 17.7.4 The transfer of assets abroad regime: non-UK resident childrens trusts
- 18. Wills
- 18.4.3 The transferable nil-rate band
- 18.5.5 Different structures: the balance of advantage
- 18.6.1 The issues, subject to the transferable nil-rate band
- 18.6.2 Statement of Practice SP 10/79
- 19. Post-death Planning
- 20. Compliance
Chapter: 2 - Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
Settlor and spouse/civil partner should be excluded
2.3.2
To be effective for IHT purposes the settlor must be excluded from benefit to avoid the GWR regime (FA 1986 s102): see 3.2.2. There is no pro rata provision. While generally the pre-owned assets (POA) regime (see 3.2.3) will not apply if either GWR does or would but for certain express exceptions, the two regimes are not completely mutually exclusive. Hence, for example, while GWR requires a dispostion by way of gift, a disposal of land with full consideration which the donor occupies may be caught by POA. The following comments about the spouse/civil partner apply to the POA regime for settled intangible property just as they do to GWR. The settlor’s spouse/civil partner can be included, although this will have Income Tax implications (under ITTOIA 2005 Part 5 Chapter 5) and, before 2008/09, also CGT implications (TCGA 1992 s77, repealed from 2008/09). However, these anti-avoidance provisions will not apply if the spouse/civil partner can benefit only after the settlor’s death.


