- 1. The Scope of the Book: Estate Planning Introduced
- 1.4.5 Three recent taxpayer successes
- 1.5.7 Transactions in securities
- 1.5.13 Two offshore disclosure regimes: 2007 and 2009
- 1.6.1 ‘Spotlights’ and ‘Signposts’
- 4. Trusts: Tax-Efficient Management
- 6. The Family Business
- 9. Investments
- 11. Pensions
- 11.2.2 Withdrawing benefits
- 11.2.3 Transitional provisions
- 11.2.4 Unregistered schemes
- 11.3.1 The basic rule
- 11.3.2 Tax relief
- 11.3.3 Scheme input periods
- 11.3.4 Occupational schemes
- 11.4.1 SIPPs and SSASs distinguished
- 11.4.3 Transactions with employers
- 11.5.2 Tax-free cash
- 11.5.5 Death benefits
- 11.5.6 Age 75: ASP or annuity purchase?
- 11.5.7 Maximise or minimise income in retirement?
- 12. Charitable Giving
- 15. Leaving the UK
- 16. Non-UK Domiciliaries Living in the UK
- 17. Offshore Trusts and Companies
- 18. Wills
- 20. Compliance
Chapter: 2 - Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
Settlor and spouse/civil partner should be excluded
2.3.2
To be effective for IHT purposes the settlor must be excluded from benefit to avoid the GWR regime (FA 1986 s102): see 3.2.2. There is no pro rata provision. While generally the pre-owned assets (POA) regime (see 3.2.3) will not apply if either GWR does or would but for certain express exceptions, the two regimes are not completely mutually exclusive. Hence, for example, while GWR requires a dispostion by way of gift, a disposal of land with full consideration which the donor occupies may be caught by POA. The following comments about the spouse/civil partner apply to the POA regime for settled intangible property just as they do to GWR. The settlor’s spouse/civil partner can be included, although this will have Income Tax implications (under ITTOIA 2005 Part 5 Chapter 5) and, before 2008/09, also CGT implications (TCGA 1992 s77, repealed from 2008/09). However, these anti-avoidance provisions will not apply if the spouse/civil partner can benefit only after the settlor’s death.


